That Fit Friend is supported by its readers. I [Jake Boly] run this site myself and buy the gear I review. If you purchase through my site, I may earn commissions on sales, read more here!
I tell you what, TYR came out to play with their CXT-2 Trainer. For this shoe, it seems like TYR took all of the feedback provided by the community for the CXT-1 and implemented the changes for this model.
For example, the toe box is wider, the drop is lower, and the midfoot durability issues have been completely nipped in the butt. When it’s with my 500 lb deadlifts or WODs where I program rope climbs and cleans, I’ve been happy with the CXT-2s.
I still don’t think this will be a training shoe built for everyone. However, I do think they’ll have a much larger reach than the CXT-1 trainer did, and it should capture a much larger market share.
Who Should Buy This Shoe?
- CrossFit athletes. I’ll be the first to tell you I didn’t love the CXT-1’s durability for CrossFit. The CXT-2 is a much different story, though. These have been bombproof for my WODs, and they’ve held up exceptionally well.
- Lifters who enjoyed more built-out models for lifting like the Reebok Nano X. The CXT-2 somewhat reminds me of the Nano X in the sense that it has a flatter and more “built” midsole, heel, and forefoot. This makes it great for lifting.
- Athletes who loved the CXT-1 but found them just a smidge too narrow. The increase in 4mm width throughout this should give them a more spacious fit, and as someone with an E/EE-width foot who found the CXT-1 snug, I appreciate this.
Who Shouldn’t Buy This Shoe?
- Flat footed individuals. This model has a bit of arch to it, like its predecessor, so if you have a flat foot and hate any form of arch pressing into your midfoot, then I’d pass on these.
- Minimalist shoe lovers. If you like trainers that have more flexibility, like the Haze Trainer or Inov8 F Fly, then you’ll likely not appreciate the more “built out” of these. Great for some, but a miss for minimalism-driven athletes.
- Feet that exceed a 3E width — tread lightly here. Now, this model has a wide iteration, so I’m mostly speaking of the core model. Even with its increase in width, I’m not convinced this shoe will deliver for exceptionally wide-footed friends.
Sizing Suggestions
- Removable Insole: Yes
- Width: Medium/Slightly Wide
- Narrower Feet Sizing: True to Size
- Wider Feet Sizing: True to size up to E/EE. 3E+ pass on these.
- Flatter Feet Sizing: These have some arch to them.
- Relative Sizing: Go with your normal Nike, Reebok, and RAD sizes.
What’s New With the CXT-2 Trainer?
Compared to its predecessor, the debut CXT-1, the 2 has received handfuls of updates. In fact, this model has pretty much received a full overhaul with its core DNA and build. The 5 major updates to note for durability and performance include:
- The heel-to-toe drop was brought down to 7mm from 9mm.
- There’s a new TPU/rubbery wrap around the midfoot and boot for durability.
- The width has been increased by 4mm throughout the core model (they also have a wide version).
- The upper has been rebuilt with new mesh, textile, and synthetic overlays and patterns.
- The outsole features TYRTac, which is the material also used in TYR’s DropZero models.
Performance Assessment
To assess the TYR CXT-2 Trainer’s performance, I made a point to push this shoe hard in three verticals. I tested this shoe for various CrossFit WODs, heavier lifting, and for general cross-training — think athletic-style training.
My goals revolved around testing to see if they fixed the mixed durability issue in CrossFit, assessing where this shoe’s Surge NRG midsole stability thresholds exist, and if it’s comfortable for conditioning and jumping.
Test Thresholds | TF2 Rating |
|
Deadlift | 500 x 3 | 8.8/10 |
CrossFit |
Fran, DT, and Rope Climbs | 9/10 |
Box Jumps/Jump Rope |
30-sec bouts / 36″ Inch Height | 8/10 |
1-Mile run |
Curved Treadmill | 7.5/10 |
Surge NRG Foam Is Stable for Heavy Lifts
The CXT-2 Trainer is definitely a model that I’d say has a lifting bias with its construction. I thought the CXT-1 did a good job for heavy lifting, so I’m not necessarily surprised the CXT-2 delivered on this front as well.
For my lifting tests, I used these shoes for a plethora of strength workouts, but some notable lifts hit in these include 500 lb deadlifts, 405 lb speed trap bar deadlifts, 275 lb front squats, and 205 lb deficit reverse lunges.
In all of these lifts, I never had glaring issues with stability, and I was impressed with this shoe’s ability to help the foot remain planted when doing heavy single-leg work. The Surge NRG Foam has a denser feeling, and there’s not so much toe spring that you feel pitched forward in these.
The wider construction is also nice for accommodating a bit more toe splay in these, and while these do have some arch, I didn’t find it overly offputting when squatting and deadlifting. For context, I have a normal arch height.
I did have a bit of a concern with the TYRTac outsole because, in my initial tests, I was having some slip issues with it on turf, but for lifting, it was never an issue. I made sure to test things like sumo deadlifts, an exercise where you’ll always notice slippage, on rubber gym floors and wooden platforms — no problems for lifting.
Bombproof for CrossFit and Strong Overall for Cross-Training
If there’s one quality-of-life update with this shoe, we should tip our hats to it. It’s the TPU wrap covering the midsole around the midfoot and heel. This update was MUCH needed as the rubber in the CXT-1 often caught on ropes and broke. Me and my community had this issue.
In every CrossFit WOD I’ve thrown at these, they’ve been stellar. The midsole is bouncy enough to keep them stable yet comfortable for barbell cycling and things like walking lunges and kettlebell snatches.
I also like that the TPU wrap doesn’t take away from the bite you get on rope climbs and that it promotes slide when doing handstand push-ups. I know, I know, I sound overly positive here — I’m just always happy when a company listens to durability feedback and implements positive changes.
At the end of the day, I don’t think you’ll be disappointed with the CXT-2 for CrossFit if they fit your foot anatomy and you were a fan of models like the Reebok Nano 9 and X, AKA heavier and more dense trainers.
For cross-training, I’ve also been pretty impressed with the CXT-2. The good with this shoe revolves around its midsole, upper security, and ankle construction. The tongue gusset and blend of upper materials in this shoe do a good job of locking the foot down.
I’ve been happy with their performance when testing this shoe’s spillover for things like skater strides and lateral box jumps. There’s enough of a sidewall in this model to really dig into the lateral forefoot and midfoot.
My one concern with this shoe for cross-training for some athletes is their performance on turf for heavy sled pushes. When pushing 5-6 plates, I noticed that I had a little slip in these, so I made a point to thoroughly test this to get a full picture of what was going on.
First, I replicated the test on different turfs, and what I noticed was that newer turfs gripped a bit better than older turfs in gyms. Second, the YouTube community discussed how sometimes outsole stickiness can vary when there’s a coating, like in my red colorway.
Third, I asked my friends who bought these for their feedback, and they reported that they had a minimal slip in different colorways. All that to say, I wouldn’t stress this detail too much, and if you are a heavy sled athlete, then cop a different colorway than the red one featured here.
Okay for Running, Meh for All-Day Wear
As you could probably expect, the CXT-2 Trainer was just “okay” for running. It’s not going to be your CrossFit-focused model that also feels good for a 5k run or more hybrid-focused sessions.
For WODs, where I programmed 800-meter bouts, and for my workouts, where I was doing curved treadmill 400s and 1-mile cooldowns, this shoe got the job done, though. It just wouldn’t be the shoe that I call the most comfortable for running.
If you do want a shoe that can excel for CrossFit and more running, then I’d look into something like the Inov8 F Fly. I’ve enjoyed those as a bridge-style hybrid shoe. Outside of that model, when in doubt, get a true running shoe if you’re logging good miles.
For walking and all-day comfort, the CXT-2 isn’t my favorite trainer for tackling this. When wearing this shoe for long durations or for walking the pup 3+ miles, I don’t love the lower tongue gusset on this model.
These features are great for training, but I like to wear my training shoes a little looser when I’m rocking them casually, and I notice that my feet don’t get the same room to breathe in these as in other models.
If I’m traveling and my feet all day, I’ll typically reach for the Haze Trainer if I’m only bringing one training shoe with me or a barefoot shoe if I want more room to let the dogs breathe.
Construction Details
Midsole
- This model features TYR’s Surge NRG Foam midsole. It’s a medium-density foam that doesn’t compress super easily by touch and when loaded.
- There’s a rubber/TPU wrap that now encloses the midfoot and heel. The CXT-1’s midfoot outsole wrap would sometimes break with rope climbs, so this was a nice tweak.
- The stack height in this shoe is what I would call moderate. Think Metcon and Nano stack height.
Outsole
- The rubber on this shoe’s outsole is built with the TYRTac component, which is now becoming a norm for TYR’s training-focused shoes. There’s an extended outsole wrap over the toe and midfoot.
- This rubber has a decent grip overall, but I do worry that some of the translucent outsoles may be lacking on certain turf surfaces (as mentioned above).
- The tread profile is pretty low on this shoe, but I haven’t noticed any glaring durability issues regarding outsole fading.
Upper
- There’s a light internal toe guard that helps give this shoe’s toe extra protection. This was nice when doing toes-to-bar and accidentally kicking the bar a little too hard.
- There’s a chainlink mesh/knit that runs from the forefoot into the midfoot, and thus far, it’s done a good job with abrasion resistance. Typically, chainlink meshes do a good job of durability.
- The boot has a bit of cushion and structure to it, which helps add to this shoe’s ankle support. I don’t think the padding is so aggressive that there will be a ton of rubber issues for many.
Laces and Tongue
- There are 5 core eyelets on this shoe, and the three middle eyelets utilize loop eyelets, which are great for giving you a nice, even locked-down fit.
- The tongue is built with a padded mesh, and there’s a gusset and two additional tongue loops for security. This tongue never moves, which is great, but for high-volume feet, it may feel a little snug at times.
- I do think the tongue’s thickness could be brought down a little bit to award you more space, but that’s a nitpick that I have from my OCD shoe reviewer eye.
Final Thoughts: Would I Get Again?
I would.
The CXT-2 Trainer has been one of my favorite training shoes of 2024. I’m super stoked TYR implemented a lot of the changes they did, too, because it’s made this shoe a stronger performer and more durable.
Plus, I haven’t seen a ton of CrossFit athletes or lifters have many major issues with this model as well, which is a good sign that they work for a wide range of needs.
If you have additional questions about this model and if it makes sense for your training/foot anatomy, drop a comment below or reach out via Instagram!
Juanfer
Hello! First of all, amazing content dude, keep it coming! I need your verdict between the Reebok Nano X5 and the TYR CXT-2 Trainer. I currently own the Nano X3, but the plastic “lifting system” broke, and I need to replace them. I also have the TYR L-1 Lifter for lifting sessions and strength or WODs that include deep squats with “heavy lifting.” I’m looking for the best all-around CrossFit shoe! For context, I’m 6’2″ (188 cm) and 229 lbs. I train 5-6 times per week following Mayhem CrossFit programming, with each session consisting of a 1-hour class followed by 30-45 minutes of lifting or strength work. My shoe size is 13 (TYR L-1 Lifter and Nano X3).
Hey! Thank you so much for checking out the content. Honestly, both are solid. TYR will run a little more dense, so if you like more “stable” feeling trainers then they’ll be the move. The Nano X5 is a little more pliable, so if the programming has a lot of jumping, short runs, and versatile work, then they may be the move!
I’d go 13.5 in the CXT-2 (go wide if you want more space in em) or 13 in the Nano X5. I’d choose based on Mayhem’s typical programming flow!
Michael
Hey mate, would you go CXT-2 or Strike Haze trainer?
Heyo! Sorry for delay, just coming back from an extended holiday break. CXT-2 if you only want a shoe for lifting/CF and you don’t care about daily wear performance. Haze if you want a shoe you can rock out and about and also train in!
Diego Chahm
Jake, CXT-2 or RAD ONE? Considering that I have CXT-1. I liked the CXT-1 but the durability its not good (my shoes has 10 months and falling apart, specially the front rubber, don´t know the proper name).
I also fell CXT-1 not good for running, they are not very comfortable after 400 meters.
I was going to say CXT-2 because their durability is WAYYYYY better overall, but if the running is a big concern for you, the RAD will be a bit more comfortable. The CXT-2 still has that dense feel that the CXT-1 had for running WODs. All that to say, I’d go RAD — just keep in mind they’ll be better for running but they won’t feel CRAZY different like a plusher training shoe, def more forgiving, though 🙂