• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
That Fit Friend

That Fit Friend

Real Shoe Reviews for the Fitness Obsessed

Shop
  • Shoe Reviews
    • Best Trainers
    • By Brand
    • Barefoot Shoes
    • Comparisons
      • Nano X4 vs Metcon 9
      • NOBULL Trainer vs Trainer+
      • TYR CXT-1 vs Haze Trainer
      • RAD vs NOBULL vs TYR
      • Dropset Trainer 2 vs Metcon 9
      • Born Primitive Savage 1 vs RAD ONE
      • Nike Air Zoom TR 1 vs Free Metcon 5
      • On Cloud X 3 vs Adidas Dropset 2
    • Cross-Training Shoes
    • Deadlift Shoes
    • Running Shoes
    • Trail Running Shoes
    • Weightlifting Shoes
  • Activewear
    • Best Men’s Training Shorts
    • Legacy Crew Sock
  • Guides
    • Training Guides
      • Bulgarian Split Squat
      • Hatfield Squat
      • Pull-Up
      • Pendlay Row
      • Pendulum Squat
      • Romanian Deadlift
      • Trap Bar Deadlift
    • Shoe Guides
      • Barefoot Shoes Guide
      • Weightlifting Shoes Guide
      • Training Shoe Size Guide
      • Training vs Running Shoes
      • CrossFit Shoes Guide
    • Calculators
      • Men’s Shoe Size Calculator
      • 1RM Calculator (Big 3)
  • About
    • About Jake
    • Revenue
    • Experts
    • Editorial Policy
    • Press Features
    • Contact
    • Subscribe
  • Shoe Finder
  • Shop
Reviews Shoes Cross Training Shoes

TYR CXT-2 vs Nike Metcon 9: Yes, There’s a Clear Winner

Jake Bolyby Jake Boly Updated Feb 18, 2025 Questions or comments?

TYR Vs Metcon

That Fit Friend is supported by its readers. I [Jake Boly] run this site myself and buy the gear I review. If you purchase through my site, I may earn commissions on sales, read more here!

For the first time in a while, we have two significantly different approaches to cross-training shoe design with the Nike Metcon 9 and TYR CXT-2 Trainer. Both shoes target similar training demographics but take vastly different approaches to their construction and performance features.

I’ve had a ton of questions about which model athletes should choose, and my answer is always the same: “It depends.” The “better” option will always depend on your training style and foot anatomy, and that’s where the nuance comes in.

With that in mind, it gets much easier to determine which model will be the stronger pick because, ultimately, the Metcon 9 and CXT-2 feel quite different on the feet and in the gym. I’ve reviewed both extensively, and here’s how I’d play it if you’re looking into these shoes.

Construction Specs to Know

Metcon 9 CXT-2 Trainer
Drop ~4mm (estimated) 7mm
Weight 13.55 oz 11.85 oz
Insole Removable foam Removable foam
Width Medium/Wide Medium/Wide with Extra Wide option
Price $150 $150
Nike Metcon 9 Product Shot

Nike Metcon 9

Pros: Toe Box Width, Stability
Cons: Blocky Heel
Weight: 12.7 oz (size 10)
Size/Fit: True to Size/Slightly Wider
Offset: 4mm
Lifting Threshold: ~515 lbs
Run Distance Threshold: <1 Mile
Price: $150
TF2 Rating: 4
Shop Nike
TYR CXT 2 Trainer Product Image TF2

TYR CXT-2

Pros: Stable, Durable
Cons: Narrower Fit
Size/Fit: True to Size/Medium Width
Offset: 7mm
Lifting Threshold: ~525 lbs
Run Distance Threshold: <1 mile
Price: $150
TF2 Rating: 4.7
Shop TYR

Performance Showdown

Stability for Lifting

Metcon 9 Details

The Metcon 9 features a dual-density midsole construction with a Hyperlift plate in the heel, providing solid stability for most lifting needs. The midsole is designed to be more stable on the outsides and more responsive internally.

One notable concern is the midfoot construction, which can lead to some medial stability issues during unilateral work. This is particularly noticeable if you tend to overpronate.

Testing the Nike Metcon 9 for Leg Day
  • Good midsole stability and I’ve deadlifted well over 500 lbs in the Metcon 9
  • Wider toe box is great for toe splay
  • Hyperlift heel adds stability for squats and catching cleans
  • Outsole traction does a good job on most surfaces/machines
  • The forefoot breaks in decently well over time, which helps combat the rigidity

CXT-2 Details

Delivers impressive stability through its Surge NRG foam midsole and TPU-wrapped construction. The built-out platform provides a secure base that feels particularly anchored during heavy lifts.

Testing the TYR CXT-2 Trainer for Deadlifts
  • Dense midsole construction that handles 500+ lb deadlifts with minimal compression
  • Deep heel cup providing enhanced ankle support
  • TPU wrap around the midfoot for additional stability
  • More traditional “blocky” feeling that lifting enthusiasts might appreciate
  • 7mm drop and denser platform make this shoe feel more structured and supportive

Winner for Lifting: Tie.

Both shoes excel in different ways. The Metcon 9 offers a more traditional, stable feel with its dual-density approach, while the CXT-2 provides stability through its built-out platform and supportive construction. Your choice should depend on whether you prefer a more connected ground feel (Metcon 9) or a more structured, supportive platform (CXT-2).

CrossFit Performance

Metcon 9 Breakdown

Features significantly enhanced durability with extensive rope guards and a reworked upper construction. However, the Hyperlift plate can feel clunky during more dynamic WODs, and some might find the rope guard construction adds unnecessary bulk.

Me Testing the Nike Metcon 9 for running cross training
  • Wider toe box allowing better foot splay during dynamic movements
  • Extensive rope guard protection (though possibly excessive)
  • Haptic overlays for improved durability
  • Rubber material on the medial toe box for additional abrasion resistance
  • Dual-density midsole providing good response for plyometric movements

CXT-2 Breakdown

These have some significant improvements in durability compared to its predecessor, with thoughtfully designed features for CrossFit-specific movements. The only notable drawback is potential grip outsole issues on certain surfaces, particularly with heavy sled work on turf.

Testing the TYR CXT-2's Rope Climbing Durability
  • Reworked TPU midfoot wrap addressing previous durability issues
  • Extended outsole layer on medial and lateral sides for rope climb grip
  • TPU heel construction allowing smooth wall-facing movements
  • Thick rubber outsole for durability
  • Secure upper construction that locks down well during dynamic movements

Winner for CrossFit: TYR CXT-2 Trainer

While both shoes are highly capable, the CXT-2’s more balanced approach to durability and performance features gives it a slight edge. It manages to provide necessary protection without the bulk that sometimes hinders the Metcon 9’s performance.

TYR CXT-2 Trainer

$150

TYR CXT 2 Trainer Product Image TF2
4.7
Stability
4.7
Versatility
4.6
Durability
4.7
Quality
4.7

Pros

  • Well-rounded performance
  • Great durability for WODs and cross-training
  • Stable midsole for heavy lifting

Cons

  • Not the best option for flat feet
  • Normal model still isn't that "wide"
  • Tongue can feel a little thick for some

Best For

  • CrossFit
  • Lifting
  • Cross-Training
  • Ankle Support

Specs

Heel-to-Toe Drop7mm
Weight13.1 oz
WidthMedium
Lifting Threshold~550 lbs
Run Distance Threshold< 1 mile
Shop TYR
Shop Rogue

Versatile Training/Cross-Training Comparison

Metcon 9 Assessment

While the Metcon 9 performs well for lifting, it has some limitations in versatile training. They can work for workouts where you’re primarily on the forefoot being explosive, but they start to fall short for dedicated HIIT and class-style workouts and sessions.

Me Testing the Nike Metcon 9 for HIIT
  • Good flexibility in the forefoot for plyometric movements
  • Responsive enough for box jumps and dynamic exercises
  • Hyperlift plate can feel clunky during athletic movements
  • Dual-density midsole provides decent bounce for plyometric work
  • Higher stack height can impact stability in certain movements

CXT-2 Assessment

The CXt-2 offers good versatility despite its built-out feel. As opposed to the Metcon 9, their density runs throughout, so it’s not super offputting for certain movements because their feel is consistent for versatile exercises.

The shoe’s heavier construction and denser ride may not appeal to those preferring minimalist training shoes, but it provides consistent performance across various training modalities.

Testing the TYR CXT-2's for Kettlebell Flows and Swings
  • Dense Surge Energy foam provides good stability while maintaining some responsiveness
  • TPU wrap helps with multi-directional movements
  • Thicker platform can feel heavy during extended conditioning work
  • Good traction on most indoor surfaces
  • May feel too built-out for those preferring minimalist shoes

Winner for Versatility: TYR CXT-2 Trainer.

While neither shoe excels in this category, the CXT-2’s more balanced approach gives it a slight edge. It manages to blend stability with enough flexibility for varied training demands.

Nike Metcon 9

$150

Nike Metcon 9 Product Shot
4.0
Stability
4.1
Versatility
4.0
Durability
4.0
Quality
3.8

Pros

  • Dual-density midsole is great for heavy lifting
  • Wider toe box is awesome for toe splay
  • Upper promotes durability in CrossFit workouts

Cons

  • TPU heel can still feel clunky
  • Not great for running and HIIT
  • Lacks breathability and rope guards can feel bulky

Best For

  • Lifting
  • Athletes
  • CrossFit
  • Wide(r) Feet

Specs

Heel-to-Toe Drop4mm
Weight13.15 oz
WidthMedium/Wide
Lifting Threshold~515 lbs
Run Distance Threshold<1 mile
Shop Box Basics
Shop Nike
Shop Rogue
Shop DSG

Running Performance

Metcon 9 Breakdown

These are best suited for short sprints and intervals — if that. Look, you can use the Metcons for short jaunts in WODs and sessions, but god bless if you’re planning using them for anything longer than a half-mile.

Are the Nike Metcon 9 good for running
  • Comfortable for 400-800 meter runs when staying on forefoot
  • Hyperlift plate can be uncomfortable for heel strikers
  • Not recommended for runs over a mile
  • Better for sprint-style conditioning within WODs
  • Dual-density midsole provides some cushioning for short runs

CXT-2 Breakdown

The CXT-2 handles short runs well but has some limitations. Look, they’re still a denser ride, but compared to the Metcon 9, there is a night and day difference. IMO, if you’re used to running in older Metcons/Nanos you won’t mind the feel of the CXT-2 for running.

Testing the TYR CXT-2's for Sled Pushes
  • Works well for interval running up to 800-meters to 1 mile
  • Dense midsole provides stability but limits cushioning
  • Better suited for forefoot and midfoot strikers
  • 7mm drop can be more forgiving than the Metcon 9’s lower drop
  • Heavier construction can feel cumbersome during longer runs

Neither shoe is designed as a primary running shoe, but both can handle the running demands typically found in CrossFit workouts.

Winner for Running: Tie.

Both shoes are designed primarily for cross-training and should be limited to short running distances. The choice here depends on your running style – forefoot runners might prefer the Metcon 9’s lower drop, while those wanting more cushioning might appreciate the CXT-2’s platform.

Sizing & Fit Comparison

Nike Metcon 9 Sizing Thoughts

  • Narrow Feet: True to size
  • Medium-Width Feet: True to size
  • Wide Feet: True to size, go up a half-size for more toe box room
  • Wider toe box compared to previous versions
  • Moderate volume in the upper
Me Testing the Nike Metcon 9 for WalkingTesting the TYR CXT-2's for Walking

CXT-2 Trainer Sizing Thoughts

  • Narrow Feet: True to size
  • Medium-Width Feet: True to size, go up a half-size for more toe box room
  • Wide Feet: Go with the wide option, I’d pass on the normal
  • 4mm wider than its predecessor
  • Available in wide version
  • Deeper heel cup for ankle support

Construction Comparison

Outsole

Nike Metcon 9

  • Full rubber outsole with extended wrap over toe box
  • Herringbone tread pattern in heel and forefoot areas
  • Exposed foam cutout in midfoot section
  • Additional rubber coverage for rope climbing durability
Nike Metcon 9 OutsoleTYR CXT-2 Outsole

TYR CXT-2

  • TYRTac rubber outsole throughout
  • Extended outsole wraps over toe box
  • Full rubber coverage for enhanced durability
  • TPU wrap extending from forefoot through midfoot

Midsole

Nike Metcon 9

  • Dual-density foam design:
    • More stable foam on shoe’s exterior
    • More responsive foam on interior
  • Hyperlift plate insert in heel (shorter than previous versions)
  • Higher overall stack height compared to previous models
Nike Metcon 9TYR CXT-2 Trainer Side Shot

TYR CXT-2

  • Surge NRG foam midsole
  • Dense, stable platform design
  • TPU reinforcement wrapping around midfoot and heel
  • 7mm heel-to-toe drop (reduced from previous model)

Upper

Nike Metcon 9

  • Mesh base with haptic overlays
  • Rubber material on medial toe box for abrasion resistance
  • Extended rope guard coverage on both medial and lateral sides
  • Five core eyelets with lace-lock feature
  • Gusseted tongue design
  • Lower profile heel boot
  • Padded mesh tongue
Nike Metcon 9 UpperTYR CXT-2 Midsole

TYR CXT-2

  • Mesh upper with synthetic overlays
  • Internal toe guard wrap
  • Leathery material in heel area for ankle support
  • Five core eyelets with three middle support loops
  • Thick padded mesh tongue with gusset
  • Deep heel cup design
  • Additional padding in boot construction

Who Should Buy the Nike Metcon 9?

  1. Athletes who have found previous Metcons too narrow
  2. Lifters who prioritize stability for heavy lifting
  3. Those who prefer a more traditional cross-training shoe feel
  4. Nike Metcon fans looking to try the latest iteration

Who Should Buy the TYR CXT-2?

  1. Athletes who like built-out, stable training shoes
  2. CrossFit enthusiasts needing enhanced durability
  3. Those who prefer shoes with good ankle support
  4. Fans of the Reebok Nano X style platform
Testing the TYR CXT-2's Stability

Final Verdict: Who Wins Overall?

Overall Winner: TYR CXT-2 Trainer.

While both shoes are strong contenders, the CXT-2’s more thoughtful construction updates and balanced approach to performance make it a slightly better option for most athletes. However, the best choice will ultimately depend on your specific training needs and preferences.

The Metcon 9 shines for those wanting a traditional cross-training shoe with improved width, while the CXT-2 excels for those wanting a more built-out, stable platform for varied training demands.

If you have any questions about either of these shoes, feel free to reach out directly, and I’ll help you determine which option might work best for your specific needs and training style.

 

Jake Boly

About Jake Boly

CSCS, MS Sports Science

Jake Boly is the Founder and Editor-In-Chief of That Fit Friend. He's often regarded as a go-to resource in various performance shoe communities. He’s been formally reviewing shoes and training gear for over 7 years and has hand-tested over 400 pairs of shoes. Jake is known on the internet and YouTube for blending his review process with his educational, strength sports, and personal training background.

Jake has a Masters in Sports Science, a Bachelors in Exercise Science, a CSCS, and he's been personal training for over 10 years helping hundreds of clients get stronger, lose weight, and accomplish their goals. He uses his exercise science brain and personal training background to make curated and thoughtful review content on the fitness gear he's testing.

  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit

Reader Interactions

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Jake Boly

About Jake Boly

CSCS, MS Sports Science

Jake Boly is the Founder and Editor-In-Chief of That Fit Friend. He's often regarded as a go-to resource in various performance shoe communities.

He’s been formally reviewing shoes and training gear for over 7 years and has hand-tested over 400 pairs of shoes.

  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit

New Articles

  • Vans UltraRange 2.0 vs UltraRange EXO (OG Model)

    Vans UltraRange 2.0 vs UltraRange EXO (OG Model)

  • STRIKE MVMNT EZ Lifter Review: A Unique Take on Squat Shoes

    STRIKE MVMNT EZ Lifter Review: A Unique Take on Squat Shoes

  • Vans UltraRange 2.0 Review | Wider Fit and Better Durability

    Vans UltraRange 2.0 Review | Wider Fit and Better Durability

Trending Now

  • Vans UltraRange 2.0 vs UltraRange EXO (OG Model)

    Vans UltraRange 2.0 vs UltraRange EXO (OG Model)

  • STRIKE MVMNT EZ Lifter Review: A Unique Take on Squat Shoes

    STRIKE MVMNT EZ Lifter Review: A Unique Take on Squat Shoes

  • Vans UltraRange 2.0 Review | Wider Fit and Better Durability

    Vans UltraRange 2.0 Review | Wider Fit and Better Durability

  • Adidas Amplimove Review: Great Shoe for Budget Shoppers?

    Adidas Amplimove Review: Great Shoe for Budget Shoppers?

That Fit Friend

That Fit Friend is designed to share honest feedback and reviews on performance-focused shoes and for various pieces of men’s apparel. Some call it having a passion for great gear, others call it an obsession.

  • About TF2
  • About Jake Boly
  • Subscribe
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Reddit

Quick Links

  • Shoe Finder Calculator
  • Shoe Guides
  • Exercise Guides
  • Expert Network
  • Contact Us
  • Shop

Categories

  • Activewear
  • Barefoot Shoes
  • Cross Training Shoes
  • Deadlift Shoes
  • Running Shoes
  • Weightlifting Shoes

That Fit Friend

253 Chesterfield Industrial Blvd
Chesterfield, MO 63005

© 2025 · That Fit Friend · Editorial Policy · Privacy Policy · Affiliate Disclosure · Accessibility

  • My Faves
    • Go-To Barefoot Shoes
    • Shoes for CrossFit
    • Shoes for Cross-Training
    • Shoes for HIIT
    • Weightlifting Shoes
    • Workout Shorts
  • Guides
    • Barefoot Vs Training Shoes
    • Cross-Training Shoe Sizing Guide
    • Training Vs Running Shoes
    • Barefoot Shoes Guide
    • Weightlifting Shoes Guide
    • Deadlift vs Romanian Deadlift
    • Split Squat vs Lunge
  • Latest Reviews
    • Haze Trainer
    • Nike Metcon 9
    • Reebok Nano X4
    • Tolos Archetype 2.0
    • TT Interval Short
    • UA TriBase Reign 6
    • Vivo Primus Lite III